FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG

OCCUPY BERNIE SANDERS

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Weiner: Giving Up Single-Payer Was 'Real Politics'

Progressive Democrats of America - Mobilizing the Progressive Vote

Weiner: Giving Up Single-Payer Was 'Real Politics'

By Michael McAuliff
November 7, 2009, New York, NY

Published by New York Daily News.

Read Weiner's statement, Waxman's statement, Pelosi's statement and Conyers statement.

Rep. Anthony Weiner says he’s not giving up on a single-payer health care system forever, but stopping the push for it now was the only pragmatic choice.

“I’m disappointed, but this is real politics,” he said, explaining that the vote he was promised on a single-payer system was causing “turbulence” and endangering the reform package.

By turbulence, he meant, among other things, certain Democrats in conservative districts felt they would have to vote for single-payer to keep peace with progressives who put them in office, even though the measure would not pass, then they would have to vote against the reform bill to appease the rest of their constituents.

But Weiner still sees many silver linings in having resurrected the single-payer debate, especially in making it clear that the public option is a compromise for liberals, not the favored option.

“We’ve won a partial victory in that the debates on the the public option have been kind of a weird surrogate debate about single-payer,” he said.

And, in an argument that GOP opponents of single-payer will surely point to, Weiner thinks the public option could be the first step.

“If the public option is a success and it succeeds in reducing costs… it may argue for doing different types of public options in the future,” he said. “This is a laboratory for a goverrment plan, albeit a small one. I think it does help us.”

And he notes that Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not withdrawn the promise she made to let him have some sort of vote on single-payer.

“The commitment the Speaker made is still there for me; she still said we’d have this vote and she’s still committed to it,” he said. “This is hopefully just a delay in the stream.”

But the bottom line now is politics. “We did not want to let the perfection of the single-payer be the enemy of the good,” Weiner said.

© Copyright 2009 NYDailyNews.com. All rights reserved.

No comments:

Post a Comment